MOTS-c vs Tesamorelin
Updated 9 sources
Key differences
- 1Tesamorelin has Phase 3 human data. MOTS-c has no human dose data.
Side by side
Facts from each record, in the same words as their own pages.
| MOTS-c | Tesamorelin | |
|---|---|---|
| Category |
|
|
| Evidence |
|
|
| FDA status |
|
|
| WADA |
|
|
| Half-life |
|
|
| Routes |
|
|
| Forms |
| Not reported |
| Reported doses |
|
|
| Most cited frequency |
|
|
| Vial sizes |
|
|
| Mixed vial keeps |
|
|
| Protocols on file |
|
|
Doses shown are what sources report, labelled by origin. Not medical advice.
Read each in full
Sources
9 sources, each checked by date. Record updated Oct 24, 2026. Numbers are restated in our own words and labelled by where they came from.
Clinical study3
- Tesamorelin pooled Phase 3 (Falutz 2010)PubMed · checked Oct 23, 2026
- PubMed search: MOTS-c pharmacokinetics or half-lifePubMed · checked Oct 23, 2026
- Performance-enhancing peptides modulating GH-IGF1 axis (Dominikowski 2026)PMC · checked Oct 23, 2026
Regulatory6
- FDA briefing document, PCAC July 23 to 24, 2026: MOTS-cFDA · checked Oct 23, 2026
- Egrifta SV labelDailyMed · checked Oct 23, 2026
- Egrifta WR labelDailyMed · checked Oct 23, 2026
- Interim 503A bulks listFDA · checked Oct 24, 2026