CJC-1295 (no DAC) + Ipamorelin vs Tesamorelin
Updated 10 sources
Key differences
- 1Tesamorelin plus ipamorelin pairs a GHRH analog that has Phase 3 visceral-fat data with the same GHRP. CJC-1295 no DAC has no human data at all.
Side by side
Facts from each record, in the same words as their own pages.
| CJC-1295 (no DAC) + Ipamorelin | Tesamorelin | |
|---|---|---|
| Category |
|
|
| Evidence |
|
|
| FDA status |
|
|
| WADA |
|
|
| Half-life |
|
|
| Routes |
|
|
| Reported doses |
|
|
| Most cited frequency |
|
|
| Vial sizes |
|
|
| Mixed vial keeps |
|
|
| Protocols on file |
|
|
Doses shown are what sources report, labelled by origin. Not medical advice.
Read each in full
Sources
10 sources, each checked by date. Record updated Oct 23, 2026. Numbers are restated in our own words and labelled by where they came from.
Clinical study3
- Tesamorelin pooled Phase 3 (Falutz 2010)PubMed · checked Oct 23, 2026
- Performance-enhancing peptides modulating GH-IGF1 axis (Dominikowski 2026)PMC · checked Oct 23, 2026
- Ipamorelin PK-PD (Gobburu 1999)PubMed · checked Oct 23, 2026
Regulatory6
- Egrifta SV labelDailyMed · checked Oct 23, 2026
- Egrifta WR labelDailyMed · checked Oct 23, 2026
- Certain bulk drug substances, safety risksFDA · checked Oct 23, 2026
- WADA Prohibited List 2026WADA · checked Oct 23, 2026
Competitor guide1
- CJC-1295 no DAC dosage guideBodyHackGuide · checked Oct 23, 2026